Skip to main content

TODAY is the Deadline! Pass it On!

HCP Comment: Put your message in your own words.  Are you a gardener? Ride a horse? Play golf?  We enjoy the outdoors and the contributions made by bats to the environment which, in turn, makes Champaign County an enjoyable place to be outdoors.  The 1,000+ families that live inside the project footprint enjoy the outdoors. There are two 18-hole golf courses inside the footprint.  The US Fish and Wildlife Service needs to understand that this is not some remote, unpopulated area.  Our only alternative to the loss of bats will be to use insecticides and pesticides. These have costs - both financial and environmental - for our families, our children, our pets, livestock and crops.  Everpower proposes to employ one of the least restrictive strategies to protect bats because they feel the cost to employ more protective alternatives is too much - it might reduce their profits.  So what?  The message is simple: the Everpower Preferred Alternative poses an unacceptable risk to the Indiana bat and other species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service should select the No Action alternative and deny the requested ITP. In the alternative, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service should require that the Buckeye Wind project operate under Alternative A (Maximally Restricted).  
1. Go to www.regulations.gov 
2. Type in FWS-R3- ES-2012-0036 in the search window.
3. Click on Comment to the right of the document.
4. Comment and submit!


Popular posts from this blog

Living With Turbines

Click here to view a news story on turbine development in a community similar to ours. Click here for another great link showing the visual impact of 400-foot turbines with 1,100-foot setbacks when placed near homes(Champaign County's proposed turbines are 492-feet to give you some idea of the visual impact of the turbines that will possibly be coming here).

Some Fascinating Reading...

There is some amazing information contained in the post-hearing brief filed by County attorneys Jane Napier and Nick Selvaggio. If you are interested in the facts about how Everpower's application (the "Applicant" in the following excerpt) was vetted by the State of Ohio, read below. Follow the link for the entire brief that was filed. "Apart from client concerns, the undersigned lack confidence in the recommendation process utilized by Staff to evaluate the Application. Specifically, the undersigned question whether the Staffs evaluation of the Application content was sufficiently thorough in order for the Staff to conclude that the criteria for certification as set forth in Ohio Revised Code Section 4906.10(A) has been met. The rationale for such position is set forth below. During the adjudicatory hearing, the Applicant used a corporate executive to "sponsor" the Application. Through the sponsor's testimony, the Applicant sought to establish the fo