Skip to main content

Living Near Wind Turbines Causes Adverse Health Effects


Source: http://www.theobserver.ca/2014/01/16/review-of-scientific-literature-found-adverse-health-effects

ENERGY: - A Lambton citizens group is hopeful that recent scientific literature that documents health impacts from wind turbines will provide ammunition in its battle against a planned wind farm.
The review of existing research literature was published in the winter edition of the Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine and concludes turbines placed too close to homes "can negatively affect the physical, mental and social well-being of people."
The group We're Against Industrial Turbines Plympton-Wyoming (WAIT-PW) is now touting the results in its efforts to lobby against Suncor Energy's plan to build up to 46 industrial wind turbines in rural Lambton County.
The review also states there is sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that noise from industrial wind turbines "is a potential cause of health effects."
Ontario requires wind turbines be built at least 550 metres back from neighbours, but opponents argue that's too close.
The Town of Plympton-Wyoming has a bylaw, being challenged in court by Suncor, calling for a 2-km setback for wind turbines.
"Our conclusions are finding, based on all the evidence we've collected and reviews we've done of the material, some genuinely do suffer adverse health effects," said Carman Krogh, one of the article's co-authors.
She and her co-authors have been researching the risk to human health from industrial wind turbines for about five years.
Krogh said health effects found in their literature review include headaches, ear pain, psychological distress from stress, but the number one impact reported was sleep disruption
"That's a very serious issue because it's known that chronic sleep disturbance will lead to more serious medical conditions," she said.
Ingrid Willemsen, with the group WAIT-PW, said, "In our opinion, if this literature review involved a drug, a car, a toy, there would be an immediate withdrawal of the product from the market."
Krogh said current setback distances and sound levels proposed for wind projects in Ontario "aren't working because, at the people end, we're having some pretty serious effects occurring."
That includes neighbours who are no longer able to live in their homes after turbines were built nearby, she said.
Krogh said she believes the government should stop approving wind projects to allow time to research the correct placement of turbines so health impacts can be avoided.
Kate Jordan, a spokesperson with Ontario's Environment Ministry, said Ontario is a leader in establishing clear wind turbine setbacks that protect human health and the environment, adding it has among the strictest in sound level criteria in North America.
"The ministry continues to review emerging scientific, health, acoustics and engineering studies to ensure Ontario's requirements remain in line with the best available science," she said.
Suncor's wind project for Lambton County has been posted on Ontario's Environmental Registry as part of the province's environmental approval process for renewable energy projects. Public comments are being accepted until Feb. 3.
paul.morden@sunmedia.ca

Popular posts from this blog

Safe setbacks: How far should wind turbines be from homes?

Safe setbacks: How far should wind turbines be from homes? Let's start with what one manufacturer considers to be safe for its workers. The safety regulations for the Vestas V90, with a 300-ft rotor span and a total height of 410 feet, tell operators and technicians to stay 1,300 feet from an operating turbine -- over 3 times its total height -- unless absolutely necessary. That already is a much greater distance than many regulations currently require as a minimum distance between wind turbines and homes, and it is concerned only with safety, not with noise, shadow flicker, or visual intrusion. In February 2008, a 10-year-old Vestas turbine with a total height of less than 200 feet broke apart in a storm. Large pieces of the blades flew as far as 500 meters (1,640 feet) -- more than 8 times its total height. The Fuhrländer turbine planned for Barrington, R.I., is 328 feet tall with a rotor diameter of 77 meters, or just over 250 feet (sweeping more than an acre of vertical air spa...

What Can You Do?

We need to take action IMMEDIATELY to halt this project. The people of Champaign County are just now becoming aware of Everpower's proposal to change ALL of our lives forever. Let your friends and family know that this is happening without your consent. A project of this size, sited this close to people, is unprecedented. Are you prepared for you and your family to be an experiment? Especially without any meaningful due process, as is the right of every citizen? There are approximately 60 leaseholders (no one can be sure as the wind companies refuse to release the information). There are approximately 38,900 non-leaseholders in the county. Why are a few dozen people dictating the future of all of us without more debate? The only people benefiting from this scheme are a few leaseholders and a multi-national corporation, who has no plans to engage in any profit-sharing from the sale of Champaign County's wind. They specialize in pitting neighbor against neighbor and mak...

Abandoned Wind Turbines Worries Officials

Abandoned wind turbines worry officials by Associated Press KTVB.COM Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:44 PM Updated yesterday at 11:32 AM BURLEY, Idaho -- Cassia County officials in southern Idaho are considering an ordinance that would require wind turbines to be decommissioned by their owners and not the county should the turbines stop turning a profit. The Times-News reports that County Commissioner Paul Christensen has asked planning and zoning to start drafting an ordinance to handle such problems in the future. Planning and Zoning administrator Kerry McMurray says dismantling one of the turbines would be expensive. The turbines can be up to 328 feet tall with 100-foot-long blades and profitable life spans of up to 20 years. McMurray says if the towers were abandoned due to bankruptcy, removing them would be the responsibility of the property owners. McMurray says most landowners probably couldn't afford that. source: www.ktvb.com