Skip to main content

Some Fascinating Reading...



There is some amazing information contained in the post-hearing brief filed by County attorneys Jane Napier and Nick Selvaggio. If you are interested in the facts about how Everpower's application (the "Applicant" in the following excerpt) was vetted by the State of Ohio, read below. Follow the link for the entire brief that was filed.

"Apart from client concerns, the undersigned lack confidence in the recommendation process utilized by Staff to evaluate the Application. Specifically, the undersigned question whether the Staffs evaluation of the Application content was sufficiently thorough in order for the Staff to conclude that the criteria for certification as set forth in Ohio Revised Code Section 4906.10(A) has been met.
The rationale for such position is set forth below.

During the adjudicatory hearing, the Applicant used a corporate executive to "sponsor" the Application. Through the sponsor's testimony, the Applicant sought to establish the foundational basis for the admissibility of the Application. Upon this sponsor's testimony, the Application was subsequently admitted into evidence. Multiple Staff subsequentiy testified that they relied on the information presented in the Application to form the basis for the recommendations submitted to
the Ohio Power Siting Board.

As the first large scale wind-powered electric generation facility being considered in the State of Ohio, the issues presented to the Ohio Power Siting Board are substantially unique and controversial. However, Staff testimony underscored (1) the Staffs lack of resources to independently evaluate the merits of the Application, (2) the Staffs resolve to overlook the issues raised by other intervenors, (3) the limited effort of Staff to review other information, and (4) the lack of rationale for divergence from (a) Applicant-proposed turbine manufacturer's setback recommendations, (b) in-state entity recommendations, and (c) foreign local and state entity financial assurance recommendations
."

Link to the post-hearing brief submitted by interveners Champaign County and Goshen, Rush, Salem, Union, Urbana and Wayne Townships filed by N. Selvaggio and J. Napier., attorneys for Champaign County.

Popular posts from this blog

Are Wind Farms Helping or Killing Us?

  From the UK's Daily Mail By James Delingpole A wind turbine in Bedfordshire; while some people have welcomed the wind farms, others say they have a detrimental effect on their health Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-2199284/Wind-farms-Are-wind-farms-saving-killing-A-provocative-investigation-claims-thousands-people-falling-sick-live-near-them.html#ixzz260mqadne "It was Uplawmoor’s tranquility and wild beauty that drew civil servant Aileen Jackson to settle there 28 years ago. She’d had enough of life in the big city. Now she wanted somewhere quiet and rural to start a family, keep her horses, and enjoy the magnificent views down the valley and out to sea to the western Scottish isles of Arran and Ailsa Craig. Then, two years ago, she says, it all turned sour. A neighbour with whom she and her family had been friends decided to take advantage of the massive public subsidies for ‘renewable’ energy. He put up a 64ft-high wind ...

Wind Turbines & Noise

Who should influence the wind turbine noise debate By Stephen E Ambrose Stephen Ambrose is a Board Certified Member of the Institute of Noise Control Engineers (INCE) with over 35 years’ experience investigating man-made problems in environmental sound and industrial noise control. I am respectfully writing in response to the letter by Gordon L. Deane; “Misinformation has undue influence in turbine debate” of February 2, 2012 for the SouthCoastToday.com. I have a question; how did he get himself in such an awkward position? His engineers should have foreseen and advised that there would be an adverse public response to wind turbine noise. There are published documents that would have clearly shown neighbors’ seeking relief with appeals for legal action. My profession as INCE member requires that I honor and obey “Canons of Ethics”. 1) Hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public. 2) Provide services only in areas of competence. 3...