Skip to main content

Some Fascinating Reading...



There is some amazing information contained in the post-hearing brief filed by County attorneys Jane Napier and Nick Selvaggio. If you are interested in the facts about how Everpower's application (the "Applicant" in the following excerpt) was vetted by the State of Ohio, read below. Follow the link for the entire brief that was filed.

"Apart from client concerns, the undersigned lack confidence in the recommendation process utilized by Staff to evaluate the Application. Specifically, the undersigned question whether the Staffs evaluation of the Application content was sufficiently thorough in order for the Staff to conclude that the criteria for certification as set forth in Ohio Revised Code Section 4906.10(A) has been met.
The rationale for such position is set forth below.

During the adjudicatory hearing, the Applicant used a corporate executive to "sponsor" the Application. Through the sponsor's testimony, the Applicant sought to establish the foundational basis for the admissibility of the Application. Upon this sponsor's testimony, the Application was subsequently admitted into evidence. Multiple Staff subsequentiy testified that they relied on the information presented in the Application to form the basis for the recommendations submitted to
the Ohio Power Siting Board.

As the first large scale wind-powered electric generation facility being considered in the State of Ohio, the issues presented to the Ohio Power Siting Board are substantially unique and controversial. However, Staff testimony underscored (1) the Staffs lack of resources to independently evaluate the merits of the Application, (2) the Staffs resolve to overlook the issues raised by other intervenors, (3) the limited effort of Staff to review other information, and (4) the lack of rationale for divergence from (a) Applicant-proposed turbine manufacturer's setback recommendations, (b) in-state entity recommendations, and (c) foreign local and state entity financial assurance recommendations
."

Link to the post-hearing brief submitted by interveners Champaign County and Goshen, Rush, Salem, Union, Urbana and Wayne Townships filed by N. Selvaggio and J. Napier., attorneys for Champaign County.

Popular posts from this blog

Safe setbacks: How far should wind turbines be from homes?

Safe setbacks: How far should wind turbines be from homes? Let's start with what one manufacturer considers to be safe for its workers. The safety regulations for the Vestas V90, with a 300-ft rotor span and a total height of 410 feet, tell operators and technicians to stay 1,300 feet from an operating turbine -- over 3 times its total height -- unless absolutely necessary. That already is a much greater distance than many regulations currently require as a minimum distance between wind turbines and homes, and it is concerned only with safety, not with noise, shadow flicker, or visual intrusion. In February 2008, a 10-year-old Vestas turbine with a total height of less than 200 feet broke apart in a storm. Large pieces of the blades flew as far as 500 meters (1,640 feet) -- more than 8 times its total height. The Fuhrländer turbine planned for Barrington, R.I., is 328 feet tall with a rotor diameter of 77 meters, or just over 250 feet (sweeping more than an acre of vertical air spa...

What Can You Do?

We need to take action IMMEDIATELY to halt this project. The people of Champaign County are just now becoming aware of Everpower's proposal to change ALL of our lives forever. Let your friends and family know that this is happening without your consent. A project of this size, sited this close to people, is unprecedented. Are you prepared for you and your family to be an experiment? Especially without any meaningful due process, as is the right of every citizen? There are approximately 60 leaseholders (no one can be sure as the wind companies refuse to release the information). There are approximately 38,900 non-leaseholders in the county. Why are a few dozen people dictating the future of all of us without more debate? The only people benefiting from this scheme are a few leaseholders and a multi-national corporation, who has no plans to engage in any profit-sharing from the sale of Champaign County's wind. They specialize in pitting neighbor against neighbor and mak...

Abandoned Wind Turbines Worries Officials

Abandoned wind turbines worry officials by Associated Press KTVB.COM Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:44 PM Updated yesterday at 11:32 AM BURLEY, Idaho -- Cassia County officials in southern Idaho are considering an ordinance that would require wind turbines to be decommissioned by their owners and not the county should the turbines stop turning a profit. The Times-News reports that County Commissioner Paul Christensen has asked planning and zoning to start drafting an ordinance to handle such problems in the future. Planning and Zoning administrator Kerry McMurray says dismantling one of the turbines would be expensive. The turbines can be up to 328 feet tall with 100-foot-long blades and profitable life spans of up to 20 years. McMurray says if the towers were abandoned due to bankruptcy, removing them would be the responsibility of the property owners. McMurray says most landowners probably couldn't afford that. source: www.ktvb.com